| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact us |  
top_img
Korean J Med Educ > Volume 20(2); 2008 > Article
Korean Journal of Medical Education 2008;20(2): 145-154. doi: https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2008.20.2.145
Computer-Based Test (CBT) 개발 및 CBT에 대한 학생들의 인식
임은정1, 이원기2, 이유철3, 최병호4, 정성광5, 이택후6, 조훈7, 손진호8, 원동일9, 공현희1, 장봉현3, 이종명3
1경북대학교 의학전문대학원 의학교육실
2경북대학교 의학전문대학원 전산실
3경북대학교 의학전문대학원 의학교육학교실
4경북대학교 의학전문대학원 소아과학교실
5경북대학교 의학전문대학원 비뇨기과학교실
6경북대학교 의학전문대학원 산부인과학교실
7경북대학교 의학전문대학원 의료정보학교실
8경북대학교 의학전문대학원 이비인후과학교실
9경북대학교 의학전문대학원 진단검사의학교실
Development of Computer-Based Test (CBT) and Student Recognition Survey on CBT
Eun-Jung Im1, Won-Kee Lee2, Yoo-Chul Lee3, Byung-Ho Choe4, Sung-Kwang Chung5, Taek-Hoo Lee6, Hune Cho7, Jin-Ho Sohn8, Dong-Il Won9, Hyun-Hee Kong1, Bong-Hyun Chang3, Jong-Myung Lee3
1Office of Medical Education, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
2Medical Information Technology Service Center, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
3Department of Medical Education, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
4Department of Paediatrics, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
5Department of Urology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
6Department of Obstetrics, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
7Department of Medical Information, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
8Department of Otolaryngology- Head & Neck Surgery, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
9Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Corresponding Author: Jong-Myung Lee, Tel: 053)420-5546, Fax: 053)423-1369, Email: jomlee@knu.ac.kr
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to understand student recognition of CBT as well as its strengths and weaknesses, and to explore the improvement methodologies for the effective development and implementation of CBT. METHODS: A questionnaire survey was conducted twice (before and after implementation of CBT) with a total of 17 multiple-choice and 2 essay-type questions. The multiple-choice questions were analyzed by frequency analysis and the essay-type questions were coded by content analysis. RESULTS: The results are as follows. First, the overall satisfaction with CBT was shown to be high. Second, students listed the merits of CBT as follows: simple correction of answers (before: 89.4%; after: 80.8%), presentation of realistic materials (before: 72.9%; after: 84.7%), prompt feedback on grades (before: 60.3%; after: 71.1%), shortened exam time and effective time scheduling (before: 86.5%; after: 66.4%), accurate estimation of abilities (before: 70.2%; after: 36.6%), and assistance in academic improvement (before: 70.9%; after: 22.1%). Drawbacks of CBT were: inconvenience of review (before: 70.9%; after: 22.1%), inconvenient screen organizations (before: 0%; after: 48.1%), possibility of cheating (before: 73.9%; after: 31.8%), and equality issue of test (before: 47.3%; after: 17.3%). CONCLUSION: Assessment paradigms are currently shifting from summative evaluation to formative evaluation, from one-off assessment to continuous assessment, and from output assessment to process assessment. Therefore, CBT must be expanded to move from result-oriented summative evaluation to formative evaluation continuously monitoring the student learning process.
Keywords: Computer-based test;Evaluation;Medical education
Editorial Office
The Korean Society of Medical Education
(204 Yenji-Dreamvile) 10 Daehak-ro, 1-gil, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03129, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2286-1180   Fax: +82-2-928-1647
E-mail : kjme_office@daum.net
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © 2018 by Korean Journal of Medical Education. All rights reserved.                 powerd by m2community