Comparison of results between modified-Angoff and bookmark methods for estimating cut score of the Korean medical licensing examination
Mikyoung Yim
Korean J Med Educ. 2018;30(4):347-357.   Published online 2018 Dec 1     DOI: https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2018.110
Citations to this article as recorded by Crossref logo
Unveiling fairness in scoring: a thorough method for precise cutoff score calculation in education assessment
Alireza Akbari, Mohsen Shahrokhi
Quality Assurance in Education.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
Analysis on Validity and Academic Competency of Mock Test for Korean Medicine National Licensing Examination Using Item Response Theory
Han Chae, Eunbyul Cho, SeonKyoung Kim, DaHye Choi, Seul Lee
Keimyung Medical Journal.2023; 42(1): 7.     CrossRef
Standard-Setting for Continuing Education Assessment of Select New Competencies
Dixon Thomas, Amal Abdalla, Kimberly McKeirnan, Sherief Khalifa
Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions.2022; 42(1): e96.     CrossRef
Evaluating the cutoff score of the advanced practice nurse certification examination in Korea
Younhee Kang
Nurse Education in Practice.2022; 63: 103407.     CrossRef
Possibility of using the yes/no Angoff method as a substitute for the percent Angoff method for estimating the cutoff score of the Korean Medical Licensing Examination: a simulation study
Janghee Park
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2022; 19: 23.     CrossRef
Possibility of independent use of the yes/no Angoff and Hofstee methods for the standard setting of the Korean Medical Licensing Examination written test: a descriptive study
Do-Hwan Kim, Ye Ji Kang, Hoon-Ki Park
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2022; 19: 33.     CrossRef
Comparison of the validity of bookmark and Angoff standard setting methods in medical performance tests
Majid Yousefi Afrashteh
BMC Medical Education.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
Multiple‐Choice versus Open‐Ended Questions in Advanced Clinical Neuroanatomy: Using a National Neuroanatomy Assessment to Investigate Variability in Performance Using Different Question Types
Wassim H. Merzougui, Matthew A. Myers, Samuel Hall, Ahmad Elmansouri, Rob Parker, Alistair D. Robson, Octavia Kurn, Rachel Parrott, Kate Geoghegan, Charlotte H. Harrison, Deepika Anbu, Oliver Dean, Scott Border
Anatomical Sciences Education.2021; 14(3): 296.     CrossRef
Setting a standard for low reading proficiency: A comparison of the bookmark procedure and constrained mixture Rasch model
Tabea Feseker, Timo Gnambs, Cordula Artelt, Karl Bang Christensen
PLOS ONE.2021; 16(11): e0257871.     CrossRef
Using the Angoff method to set a standard on mock exams for the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination
Mi Kyoung Yim, Sujin Shin
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2020; 17: 14.     CrossRef
Similarity of the cut score in test sets with different item amounts using the modified Angoff, modified Ebel, and Hofstee standard-setting methods for the Korean Medical Licensing Examination
Janghee Park, Mi Kyoung Yim, Na Jin Kim, Duck Sun Ahn, Young-Min Kim
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2020; 17: 28.     CrossRef
The Use of Rasch and Item Mapping in Determining Cut Score of Comprehensive Pre internship Exam
Sh Habibzadeh, A Delavar, NA Farrokhi, A Minaei, M Jalili
Research in Medical Education.2019; 11(3): 59.     CrossRef
Comparison of standard-setting methods for the Korean Radiological Technologist Licensing Examination: Angoff, Ebel, bookmark, and Hofstee
Janghee Park, Duck-Sun Ahn, Mi Kyoung Yim, Jaehyoung Lee
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2018; 15: 32.     CrossRef