Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • KSME
  • E-Submission

KJME : Korean Journal of Medical Education

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR AUTHORS AND REVIEWERS

Articles

Original Research

Medical students’ satisfaction with clinical clerkship and its relationship with professional self-concept

Korean Journal of Medical Education 2019;31(2):125-133.
Published online: May 30, 2019

1Office of Medical Education, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea

2Ajou Center for Clinical Excellence, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea

3Department of Medical Education, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea

4Department of Psychiatry, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea

Corresponding Author: Miran Kim (https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5553-5334) Office of Medical Education, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164 World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon 16499, Korea Tel: +82.31.219.5250 Fax: +82.31.219.5245 email: kmr5300@ajou.ac.kr
• Received: November 6, 2019   • Revised: February 11, 2019   • Accepted: March 6, 2019

© The Korean Society of Medical Education. All rights reserved.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 9,339 Views
  • 193 Download
  • 6 Crossref
  • 6 Scopus
prev next

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Satisfaction with Clinical Clerkship and Its Determinants Among Korean Medicine Students
    Inseong Lee, Eui-Hyoung Hwang, Kang Kwon, Hye-Yoon Lee
    Journal of Pharmacopuncture.2025; 28(2): 108.     CrossRef
  • Pharmacy Students’ Perceptions of Remote versus Face-to-Face Learning Experience
    Jenna M. Mills, Celeste N. VanAtta, Racheal S. Hendershot, Shantanu Rao
    Pharmacy.2023; 11(3): 97.     CrossRef
  • The Factors Affecting the Level of Job Satisfaction of Family Physicians and their Relationship with Professional Self-Esteem
    Mehmet NAZLIGÜL, Arzu AYRALER
    Online Türk Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi.2023; 8(3): 332.     CrossRef
  • Effects of reflective learning based on visual mind mapping in the fundamentals of nursing course: A quasi-experimental study
    Kai-Han Yang, Hong Chen, Chun-Juan Liu, Fei-Fei Zhang, Xiao-Lian Jiang
    Nurse Education Today.2022; 119: 105566.     CrossRef
  • Mediation effects of clinical practice stress between clinical education environment and satisfaction with clinical practice
    Youngsoon Park, Kyunghee Chun, Mihye Kwon
    Korean Journal of Medical Education.2021; 33(1): 27.     CrossRef
  • Trajectory of growth in Taiwanese nursing students' professional self-concept over two years and its association with critical thinking and class climate
    Yi-Chuan Chang, Mei-Ling Yeh, Kuan-Chia Lin, Kwua-Yun Wang
    Journal of Professional Nursing.2021; 37(4): 729.     CrossRef

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Medical students’ satisfaction with clinical clerkship and its relationship with professional self-concept
Korean J Med Educ. 2019;31(2):125-133.   Published online May 30, 2019
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Medical students’ satisfaction with clinical clerkship and its relationship with professional self-concept
Korean J Med Educ. 2019;31(2):125-133.   Published online May 30, 2019
Close
Medical students’ satisfaction with clinical clerkship and its relationship with professional self-concept
Medical students’ satisfaction with clinical clerkship and its relationship with professional self-concept
Scales Subscales Mean±standard deviation
Satisfaction with clinical clerkship 3.49±0.56
Course 3.82±0.67
Contents 3.49±0.55
Instruction 3.56±0.67
Environment 3.61±0.66
Hours 3.41±0.87
Evaluation 3.08±0.92
Professional self-concept 2.94±0.35
Professional practice 2.97±0.48
Leadership 2.91±0.53
Flexibility 2.99±0.48
Skill 3.00±0.54
Satisfaction 2.96±0.52
Communication 2.88±0.46
Variable Course Contents Instruction Environment Hours Evaluation Total
Gender
 Male 3.75±0.71 3.52±0.58 3.59±0.67 3.70±0.67 3.47±0.91 3.15±0.92 3.53±0.58
 Female 3.95±0.57 3.43±0.49 3.50±0.68 3.46±0.63 3.30±0.79 2.93±0.93 3.43±0.54
 t-value -1.33 0.76 0.57 1.64 0.84 1.04 0.79
Year
 Third year 3.75±0.71 3.44±0.62 3.55±0.71 3.62±0.72 3.58±0.75 3.01±0.86 3.49±0.59
 Fourth year 3.89±0.62 3.54±0.47 3.57±0.63 3.62±0.61 3.24±0.96 3.14±0.98 3.50±0.54
 t-value -0.93 -0.79 -0.20 0.05 1.82 -0.67 -0.06
Variable Professional practice
Satisfaction Communication Total
Leadership Flexibility Skill Total
Gender
 Male 3.00±0.57 3.09±0.48 3.08±0.54 3.06±0.50 2.97±0.53 2.80±0.48 2.94±0.36
 Female 2.74±0.42 2.80±0.41 2.84±0.52 2.80±0.38 2.96±0.50 3.02±0.37 2.92±0.34
 t-value 2.13* 2.71** 1.92 2.42* 0.12 -2.12* 0.23
Year
 Third year 2.89±0.58 2.96±0.46 3.03±0.55 2.96±0.50 2.89±0.54 2.81±0.41 2.89±0.35
 Fourth year 2.93±0.49 3.02±0.49 2.98±0.54 2.98±0.46 3.04±0.49 2.94±0.50 2.99±0.35
 t-value -0.37 -0.53 0.44 0.15 -1.36 -1.33 -1.30
Variable Professional practice
Satisfaction Communication Professional self-concep
Total Leadership Flexibility Skill
Course 0.29** 0.21 0.33** 0.27* 0.31** 0.16 0.35**
Contents 0.35** 0.26* 0.40** 0.31** 0.44** 0.22* 0.47**
Instruction 0.33** 0.26* 0.38** 0.29** 0.37** 0.10 0.37**
Environment 0.43** 0.38** 0.42** 0.39** 0.23* 0.08 0.34**
Hours 0.43** 0.36** 0.46** 0.38** 0.29** 0.11 0.38**
Evaluation 0.25** 0.19 0.32** 0.20 0.07 -0.03 0.13
Satisfaction with clinical clerkship 0.44** 0.35** 0.49** 0.39** 0.34** 0.12 0.42**
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics of Ratings by Scales
Table 2. Satisfaction Levels in Clerkship Experience by Gender and Year of Study (N=84)

Data are presented as mean±standard deviation.

Table 3. Empathy Score according to the Enneagram Hornevian Group

Data are presented as mean±standard deviation.

p<0.05,

p<0.01.

Table 4. Correlations of Variables

p<0.05,

p<0.01.