Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/kjme/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2026-01.txt): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 97 Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 98 Comparison of Patient-Physician Interaction (PPI) Evaluation between Different Grade Medical Students
Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • KSME
  • E-Submission

KJME : Korean Journal of Medical Education

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR AUTHORS AND REVIEWERS

Articles

Original Article

Comparison of Patient-Physician Interaction (PPI) Evaluation between Different Grade Medical Students

Dae hyun Kim1,2, Hui jung Yoon2, Min-ji Lee2, Ji-yon Ahn2, Seun-jun Lee2, Young-sung Suh2
KJME 2010;22(3):169-176. Published online: September 30, 2010
1Department of Medical Education, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
2Department of Family Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Corresponding author:  Dae hyun Kim, Tel: +82.53.250.7548, Fax: +82.53.250.7675, 
Email: dhkim@dsmc.or.kr
Received: 7 July 2009   • Revised: 3 October 2009   • Accepted: 14 July 2010
  • 6,481 Views
  • 70 Download
  • 6 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus
prev next

PURPOSE
A proper patient-physician interaction (PPI) creates rapport between doctors and patients and improves medical outcomes. The importance of PPI evaluation items was evaluated in each medical student in grades 3 and 4, before and after their clinical clerkship.
METHODS
Six PPI evaluation guidelines (SEGUE, Kalamazoo Consensus, Calgary-Cambridge Guide, Macy guideline, 2 Korean Consortium guidelines) were selected and importance of each guideline was evaluated through the structured questionnaire in 73 pre-clinical clerkship (3rd-grade) and 78 post-clinical clerkship (4th-grade) medical students.
RESULTS
The importance of medical communication items among total clinical performance, students-rated PPI portion was 21+/-9.7%. In SEGUE recommendations, 'Elicit information' was evaluated to be most important items before (58.3%) and after (65.8%) clinical clerkship. In Kalamazoo Consensus, 'Gathering information' was evaluated to be most important (49.3%/42.3%), same as in Calgary-Cambridge Guide (52.1%/56.4%) and Daegu Gyeongbuk Consortium (47.9%/43.6%). In the Macy guideline, 'Listening' was evaluated to be most important (28.8%/33.3%). In the Seoul Gyeonggi Consortium, 'Buidling relationships' was evaluated to be most important (23.3%/28.2%).
CONCLUSION
In the 4th-grade post-clerkship medical students after clinical clerkship, importance of 'Gathering information' was evaluated to be less important, however, 'Giving information' and 'Understanding the patient perspective' was evaluated to be more important, compared to pre-clerkship students 3rd-grade students.

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Comparison of Patient-Physician Interaction (PPI) Evaluation between Different Grade Medical Students
Korean J Med Educ. 2010;22(3):169-176.   Published online September 30, 2010
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Comparison of Patient-Physician Interaction (PPI) Evaluation between Different Grade Medical Students
Korean J Med Educ. 2010;22(3):169-176.   Published online September 30, 2010
Close