| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact us |  
top_img
Korean J Med Educ > Volume 17(1); 2005 > Article
Korean Journal of Medical Education 2005;17(1): 97-105. doi: https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2005.17.1.97
객관구조화진료시험 (OSCE)에서 전문 표준화 환자와 비전문 표준화 환자간의 비교연구
정기훈1, 최은아1, 배종대1, 나득영2, 손인기3, 고철우4, 김대현5, 박은희6, 박성환7, 고석봉8, 이춘기9
1동국대학교 의과대학 외과
2동국대학교 의과대학 내과
3동국대학교 의과대학 정신과
4경북대학교 의과대학 소아과
5계명대학교 의과대학 가정의학과
6계명대학교 의과대학 의학교육학과
7대구가톨릭대학교 의과대학 외과
8대구가톨릭대학교 의과대학 산부인과
9영남대학교 의과대학 내과
Comparison of Professional Standardized and Amateur Standardized Patients in OSCE
Ki-Hoon Jung1, Eun-Ha Choi1, Jong-Dae Bae1, Deuk-Young Na2, In-Ki Son3, Chul-Woo Ko4, Dae-Hyun Kim5, Eun-Hee Park6, Sung-Hwan Park7, Suk-Bong Ko8, Choon-Ki Lee9
1Department of General Surgery, Dongguk University School of Medicine, Korea.
2Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University School of Medicine, Korea.
3Department of Psychiatry, Dongguk University School of Medicine, Korea.
4Department of Kyungbuk, Paediatrics, Kyungbuk University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
5Department of Family Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
6Department of Medical Eduation, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
7Department of General Surgery, Daegu- Catholic University School of Medicine, Korea.
8Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Daegu- Catholic University School of Medicine, Korea.
9Department of Daegu and Internal Medicine, Yeongnam University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Corresponding Author: Ki-Hoon Jung, Tel: 054)770-8217, Fax: 054)770-8378, Email: jkh6110@paran.com
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The standardized patient (SP) is a person carefully trained to represent a real patient case for consistent and accurate use in student performance evaluation and/or training, has added a very important dimension in OSCE. The purpose of this study is compared a well-trained professional SP (PSP) and a amateur SP (ASP) in OSCE. METHODS: We surveyed 378 students apprentices and staffs involving OSCE of Daegu-Kyungbuk Consortium and analysed the validity between the PSP and ASP after OSCE. RESULTS: Of 92 total stations in which students were evaluated by staff evaluator, SP were used in 47 stations (48%). Of the 47 stations, professional SP 7 stations (16%). The questionnaires were made to know the effectiveness and realistics of SP. The results were different between station used PSP and ASP. Moreover, it was significantly different between the staffs and the students. The SP can offer advantages such as availability, adaptability and effectivity. If trained well, they also can provide positive effects to the students and the staffs. The PSP provides efficient and reliable opportunity to assess clinical skills in a safe situation without any harm to the real patients. CONCLUSION: It is suggested that the use of SP is stimulating and challenging way of evaluating the OSCE. Also, It appeared to be financially and availably feasible if it commonly owned in the boundary of the land such Daegu-Kyungbuk Consortium.
Keywords: Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE);Standardized patient (SP)
Editorial Office
The Korean Society of Medical Education
(204 Yenji-Dreamvile) 10 Daehak-ro, 1-gil, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03129, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2286-1180   Fax: +82-2-747-6206
E-mail : kjme_office@daum.net
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © 2022 by Korean Society of Medical Education.                 Developed in M2PI