1. Morcke AM, Dornan T, Eika B. Outcome (competency) based education: an exploration of its origins, theoretical basis, and empirical evidence. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2013;18(4):851-863.
2. Spady WG. Outcome-based education: critical issues and answers. Arlington, USA: American Association of School Administrators; 1994.
3. Harden RM. AMEE guide no. 14: outcome-based education: part 1-an introduction to outcome-based education. Med Teach 1999;21(1):7-14.
4. McNeil HP, Hughes CS, Toohey SM, Dowton SB. An innovative outcomes-based medical education program built on adult learning principles. Med Teach 2006;28(6):527-534.
5. Lockyer J, Carraccio C, Chan MK, et al. Core principles of assessment in competency-based medical education. Med Teach 2017;39(6):609-616.
6. Harden RM. Outcome-based education: the ostrich, the peacock and the beaver. Med Teach 2007;29(7):666-671.
7. Holmboe ES, Sherbino J, Englander R, Snell L, Frank JR; ICBME Collaborators. A call to action: the controversy of and rationale for competency-based medical education. Med Teach 2017;39(6):574-581.
8. Shaikh AS, Prajapati P, Shah PD. Significance of the transition to outcome based education: explore the future. Paper presented at: National Conference on “Quest for Excellence in Teaching, Learning and Evaluation” (NAAC Sponsored); February 22-23, 2017; Anand, India.
9. World Federation for Medical Education. Basic Medical Education: WFME Global Standards for Quality Improvement: the 2015 revision. Ferney-Voltaire, France: WFME Office; 2015.
10. Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Functions and structure of a medical school: standards for accreditation of medical education programs leading to the MD degree. Washington DC, USA: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2019.
11. MacCarrick GR. A practical guide to using the World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) standards: WFME 1: mission and objectives. Ir J Med Sci 2010;179(4):483-487.
12. Spady WG. Outcome-based education. Belconnen, Australia: Australian Curriculum Studies Association; 1993.
13. Olds GR, Barton KA. Building medical schools around social missions: the case of the University of California, Riverside. Health Syst Reform 2015;1(3):200-206.
15. Furman GC. School district approval for staff development: “Garbage Can” decision-making. Washington DC, USA: American Educational Research Association; 1986.
16. Tamir E, Grabarski MK. Under pressure: why school managements use garbage can model of decision? Res Educ Adm Leadersh 2018;3(1):1-28.
17. Kreiner K. Ideology and management in a garbage can situation. In: March JG, Olsen JP, eds. Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlaget; 1976:156-173.
18. Campbell RF, Gregg RT. Administrative behavior in education. New York, USA: Harper & Bros; 1957.
19. Jones MH. Executive decision making: the Irwin series in management. Homewood, USA: Irwin; 1962.
20. Chaing C, McSweeney L. A behavioral model of rational choice. Competit Policy Int 2010;6(1):241-258.
21. Brown R. Consideration of the origin of Herbert Simon’s theory of ‘satisficing’ (1933-1947). Manag Decis 2004;42(10):1240-1256.
22. Lindblom CE. The science of “muddling through”. Public Adm Rev 1959;19(2):79-88.
23. Etzioni A. Mixed-scanning: a “third” approach to decisionmaking. Public Adm Rev 1967;27(5):385-392.
24. Bakanauskienė I, Baronienė L. Theoretical background for the decision-making process modelling under controlled intervention conditions. Organ Vadyb Sist Tyrim 2017;(78):7-19.