의학전문대학원 신입생 선발에서의 Multiple Mini-Interview |
노혜린1,7, 이희제2, 박승배1, 양정희3,7, 김대중4, 김상현5, 이승준6, 채기봉1 |
1강원대학교 의학전문대학원 외과학교실 2강원대학교 의학전문대학원 약리학교실 3강원대학교 의학전문대학원 가정의학교실 4강원대학교 의학전문대학원 해부학교실 5강원대학교 의학전문대학원 미생물학교실 6강원대학교 의학전문대학원 내과학교실 7진료능력개발센터 |
Multiple Mini-Interview in Selecting Medical Students |
HyeRin Roh1,7, Hee Jae Lee2, Sung Bae Park1, Jeong Hee Yang3,7, Dae-Joong Kim4, Sang Hyun Kim5, Seung-Joon Lee6, Gibong Chae1 |
1Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea. 2Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea. 3Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea. 4Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea. 5Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea. 6Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea. 7Clinical Performance Center, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea. |
Corresponding Author:
HyeRin Roh, Tel: 033-258-2306, Fax: 033-258-2169, Email: hyerinr@kangwon.ac.kr Gibong Chae, Tel: 033-258-2306, Fax: 033-258-2169, Email: hyerinr@kangwon.ac.kr |
Received: March 4, 2009; Accepted: April 24, 2009. |
|
|
ABSTRACT |
PURPOSE: Selecting medical students through interviews seems difficult and the reliability of the results is one of the major concerns. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and acceptability of the Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) in selecting medical students of Kangwon National University.
METHODS: Eighty-four applicants participated in the MMI which consists of 3 8-minute stations that have 9 checklist items and 3 global items. The 3 domains that we chose were motivation to become a doctor, communication and interpersonal skills, and ethical decision-making. We placed 2 interviewers in each room. The interviewers were chosen from our faculty. We analyzed the reliability of the MMI with urGENOVA for PC. We conducted a survey of these applicants and interviewers.
RESULTS: The reliability was 0.791. Students answered that the interview was impressive and enjoyable. Students were also satisfied with the level and quality of the MMI cases.
They described that they were evaluated objectively.
Interviewers also responded positively. They stated that more stations and more efforts to develop the cases were needed to improve the reliability and validity.
CONCLUSION: The MMI was acceptable to our applicants and faculty. It is reliable for assessing medical school applicants in Korea. We should develop more stations and better cases to increase the reliability and validity of the MMI. |
Keywords:
Admission interview;Medical students selection;Generalizability;Multiple mini-interview |
|